Quantcast
Channel: Hillary Manton Lodge Fiction

Love Be the Loudest: A Q&A with Singer-Songwriter Ginny Owens

$
0
0


So! Last September, before we moved out to Memphis, my good friend Rachel Lulich organized a concert at her church in Lake Oswego, and flew the award-winning singer-songwriter Ginny Owens out to perform.

Ginny Owens at piano in concert
If you ever have the opportunity to see Ginny live - do. She does a fantastic set, engagingly sharing the songs she's written over her 18-year-long career. I recognized songs I'd heard and enjoyed in college, songs that had a different resonance for me now.

We chatted after the show, and I had the chance to invite her to come and share here about her work, her process, and her latest album. I've interviewed lots of book-writers, so it was really fun to hear from someone with a different creative and professional pursuit!

Hillary Manton Lodge: Thanks so much for stopping by for the interview! Let’s start with your newest album, Love Be the Loudest. It’s your eleventh album, and it's got a decidedly more pop-sound to it than your previous releases. What inspired that shift?

Ginny Owens: Hi Hillary! Thanks so much for having me! I have to admit, I love pop music. T-Swift and Bieber have such catchy melodies, don’t they? During my daily workout, I usually spend part of the time listening to the current hits on Apple Music. But there’s a point at which I’m over the lyrics, and I know my brain doesn’t need to take them in anymore. So part of my goal on this album was to write upbeat, pop songs that also had upbeat, hopeful messages.

Secondly, as a singer/songwriter who’s been doing this awhile, I feel like it’s super important to keep experimenting and evolving. So that’s how I ended up here.

HML: I think there's so much wisdom to that. So, when you were working on this album, how did your songwriting change – and how did it stay the same?

GO: Funny thing about pop music: it’s so simple and singable that we all think it’s easy to write. Not so! Fitting words – especially words of substance – into memorable melodies takes a good deal of work. More work, in some instances, than writing a thoughtful, singer/songwriter song. So my writing changed in the sense that I challenged myself to write what I hope are substantive lyrics into singable melodies. 

(I should say, at this point, that I had wonderful help from co-writers who patiently plodded through the process with me.) That being said, many of the songs are still introspective and pondering the heavier things, which is, in general, my typical songwriting style.




HML: I found the lyrics perfectly substantive. What you did - which I think is really smart - is pare things down to the essence, so in a few words you've got some really big ideas. For you, which tracks from this album are your favorites? Which ones felt the most personal?

GO: This is a tough one. My songs are my kids – hard to have favorites! But if I had to choose, I’d go with "The Loudest Voice,” “Love Looks Beautiful,” “The Way God Sees,” “The Fire,” “Made for Loving You,” and “God Is Love.”

That’s a long list I know. I love them all for different reasons. “The Fire” is the most personal. It was written after months of vocal challenges and a health crisis, which left me with a deeper awareness of how God meets us and holds us in the fire.

Hillary Manton Lodge and Ginny Owens
Me and Ginny after the concert!
HML: The Loudest Voice" is probably my standout favorite, but I love the vibe of "Made for Loving You" and everything about "Love Looks Beautiful. So...apparently I can't settle on one, either!

Back in September, one of the things I enjoyed is how you structured your concert as a time of songs and stories. How do you feel your storytelling feeds into your songwriting?

GO: Well, I’ve learned that as a mellow, piano-player type, I’d better be able to tell stories, so I don’t put the audience to sleep! And because all my songs have a backstory, that’s easy. I also think stories can help provide context for those in the room who don’t know the songs, and add a layer of depth for those who do.

HML: What does the process look like between writing a song and cutting a track? (This is me, freely admitting that everything I know on the subject came from the movie Once).

GO: The process used to involve sitting in a room with another writer or two and using our instruments and voices to craft a song. Then we’d record a voice memo of it, live with it for a bit, make changes, and when we were happy, go into the studio to record. But on this record – (and on most CCM or pop records you hear) – there was usually a songwriter/producer in the room, and he’d immediately begin crafting a track on the computer, while we wrote lyrics and melody. 

We’d work for 4-5 hours finishing the song, lay down a rough vocal for reference, and live with the track for a few weeks. At the end of the day, many songs would sound very similar to the original demos, just with more instrumentation and vocals. I did both kinds of writing for this album.




HML: This album is the fourth that you’ve released as an indie artist. Having released with a label as well as independently, what do you like about being indie? What are the challenges?

GO: The blessing and the curse of being an independent artist is that everything is up to you. This means you have complete creative control, which is wonderful. But it also means you have complete control over marketing, publicity, and managing your budget – which can be quite a heavy load for a creative person. People often ask me what I do every day that I’m not on the road. I always say, “I try to catch up on all the work I’ve missed.”

Playing music is the easy part. Handling the business side is the real challenge. There are many days when I think it’d be great to have a label team to do all the marketing and management. Then again, I don’t have to recoup label dollars, which usually end up being at least half the pie. In this age of streaming, where sales are smaller and royalties are more scarce, being independent is probably a better deal, if one can make the numbers work. That’s why I tour a lot. And write blogs and books, too.

HML: In the new album, you’re releasing two new versions of previously released songs, “If You Want Me To” and “Wonderful Wonder.” What made you want to record them again?

GO: I close nearly every show with these two songs, and since they’ve been around awhile, I wanted to re-imagine their production. It’s fun for me to think of new musical ideas for old songs, but I also think new sounds make them more accessible to new listeners.



HML: You’ve spoken previously about how “If You Want Me To” was inspired by the challenge of finding your career path when you were in college, and released with your debut album in 1999. I remember listening to that version then, but listening to you sing it in concert, and then the new track on the album, I feel like it’s grown and deepened even as the melody and lyrics have stayed the same. Even in the past few months, I've had the same deepening of appreciation for "The Loudest Voice." Do you have other songs that feel as though they’ve grown along with you?

GO: Why thanks! That’s a very kind thing to say. Because my songs are usually inspired by very specific seasons or stories, I do feel like they deepen with time, maybe because as I grow and change, and as God teaches me new life lessons, I bring those to the music. I can add new layers to the stories as I set up the songs. And they’re coming from a place of deeper understanding than when I first wrote them. Most songwriters will say they’re often surprised by how God will use the lyrics they wrote to challenge and change them down the road. I’ve definitely had that experience.

HML: On your YouTube Channel, you share live and lyric videos of your music, as well as your “How I See It” series about living blind. What inspired that series?

GO: One afternoon when we were shooting some footage for a lyric video, I asked my videographer if she’d mind grabbing a few simple, low-key videos about how I get things done. We started with baking, crossing the street, and using an iPhone. 

I was very surprised by the reaction from friends and fans. I began to realize there were many questions people had about how I lived life that they were too uncomfortable to ask. I also heard from parents of children with disabilities, who were encouraged to know that their children could one day live independently. The videos have sparked an ongoing dialogue about how we all see the world. I’m excited to make more!



HML: You’ve committed to donating a portion of your album sales to a variety of non-profits. Which causes do you feel passionate about?

GO: I feel passionate about oh so many causes! But so I don’t confuse the message, I’m starting with two special projects, and we’ll grow from there. We’re partnering with Compassion International to help fund their nutrition initiative, which does everything from disability care and prevention for kids, to providing clean water. We’re also working to get sponsorships for kids who have been waiting a long time. Many of these have special needs or are teenagers, so folks often overlook them.

We’re also partnering with an awesome non-profit called The Next Door, an incredible treatment program for women battling addiction. I’d love for your readers to participate in our work, either by visiting lovebetheloudest.com or by grabbing a copy of the new album!


HML: As a writer, I love hearing about how people write in different disciplines. What advice would you share with new singer/songwriters? What advice do you wish you could have given yourself when you were just starting out?

GO: The closer friends you and your writing become, the better it will serve you. If you love writing, discipline yourself to do it often, not just when you get inspired. As you create with words and music, you’ll build confidence in your gift. Find a “safe person” to run your art by – someone who will give you constructive thoughts and will champion you. Bloom where you’re planted. Connect with other musicians and writers in your area to work or just bounce ideas off each other. Play your music out as often as you can.

HML: I really love that advice - I think it's equally applicable to writing fiction. Thanks SO MUCH for stopping by and sharing!


Readers: use the form below to enter the giveaway to win a copy of Ginny's album! I listened to it a lot while I was working on the end and the edits for Jane of Austin. The songwriting and melodies are so good and so catchy - these are tracks that will stay with you in the very best way. Are you a fan of Ginny? Let us know which song of hers is your favorite in the comments!



Memphis Diaries: Part I

$
0
0
Memphis bridge - Adobe Stock

Some days I can't quite believe we made it here. In December, we packed most of the very last of our belongings into the truck and car. Stuffed, more like - the car was on a trailer, and everything I thought I might need in the apartment for the first week was wedged inside. Clothes, kitchenwares, bedding - stuffed.

I wrote "most of the last" because some of it just didn't fit. The vacuum? Left with my brother-in-law to donate (we would have donated it ourselves, but it was, like 11pm or so). And there's a lampshade we barely fit into the truck that we left with my mom to mail later.

The Grand Canyon
The drive was long and grueling. A theft in Reno on New Year's Eve resulted in the loss of personal items that cast a pall on the trip. A side-trip to the Grand Canyon was absolutely breathtaking.

We stopped in Austin (because of course) and ate all the tacos (soooo many tacos at Torchy's, which is the best, and has the loveliest staff). I toured the Capitol Building and enjoyed learning as much as I could before we left for Texarkana.

We arrived at our new apartment in Northern Mississippi during an ice storm, having re-routed to avoid the worst of the related traffic. It was after dark when we got there, the sidewalks slick and slushy. Our apartment was on the second floor, so the four of us - me, Danny, and the two pups - went up and down the stairs, carrying as much as we could upstairs into the empty apartment. We slept on an air mattress, and managed to get to our storage containers several days later for other necessities (floor lamps! Artwork! A table and chairs! Cookbooks!).

But we weren't in Memphis long before Danny was sent out to a job site in Long Beach, CA - for what turned out to be a five week stint.

I spent those five weeks exploring a little but working a lot - because of the move, I had a little time to do a lot of editing. Also up? Recipe testing.

Raspberry Cream Cheese Kolache! You'll find the recipe in Jane of Austin

I was huuuuugely grateful to my street team, who agreed to help test scones, cornbread, hand pies and a tea-spiked Texas Sheet Cake. I still tested many of the recipes - one of my favorites being the Raspberry and Cream Cheese Kolache!

Central Park in Southaven, Mississippi

The dogs and I discovered new parks in between long hours of editing. How long? I found myself taking the pups out for piddle breaks at 2 and 3am around the apartment complex, and there was an over-nighter in there, which I wasn't good at in college, and I'm really not good at in my thirties. But I bullied the manuscript into a good place - that book is on the list of Things I'm Really Proud of That Were Worth the Work.

Galley edits!

In between the copy and galley edits, I cooked. I made Ottolenghi's Cauliflower and Parmesan Cake (by way of Smitten Kitchen, by way of my friend Janell, who uses more turmeric and more Parmesan), the Kale Caesar Salad from the Forest Feast cookbook, which is sooooo good and if I had Greek yogurt in my house I would make it right now. I made a Flourless Chocolate Almond Torte, which a.) I should make again, but b.) should bake it in a water bath. Also, I should have soaked my silicone Springform pan with vinegar between baking the cauliflower and chocolate cakes, because the flavor of onion and turmeric infused the edge of the chocolate cake, which wasn't exactly the flavor profile I was looking for.

The Dixon Galleries & Garden


The weeks passed, and springtime came to Memphis.  Danny came home, and we got to revisit favorite spots, like the Memphis Botanic Gardens and the Dixon Gallery & Gardens. And a few weeks later, we put an offer in on our house. But that is a post for another day.

Tulips at the Dixon!

Release Day Strawberry Tart

$
0
0

I can't even tell you how thrilled I am that Jane of Austinis finally out and available in the world! For all of you who pre-ordered - thank you, and your copy should arrive today! And for everyone else, you can find your copy online and on shelves!

I'm also thrilled to add that Janecan be purchased as an audiobook! As an avid audiobook listener, I'm thrilled to pieces to have one of my books available in audio!

To celebrate, I'm sharing one of my favorite recipes from the book! This recipe shows up during a scene set at SxSW. Jane and her sister Celia make them as minis, but you can adapt the tart for whatever tart pans you might have. In a pinch, you can use a pie pan or 9x9 pan.


I used a rectangular tart pan I found at TJ Maxx years ago, and haven't used in ages. Now that we're settling in, it was time to pull it out! This tart sounds tricky, but it's really not hard if you give yourself plenty of time. I recommend making the tart dough the night before. But as much as the crust takes a bit of planning, the filling comes together in a snap. You could totally make the tart shell a day early, if you wanted.

The filling? Well, I have a noted love of mascarpone, and use it here with some creme fraiche to make a sweet, rich, and tangy filling that doesn't require any time at the stove. Creme fraiche is kinda like a more delicate sour cream, made from thickened buttermilk. In a pinch you could substitute ricotta cheese and sour cream - just know that it'll change the texture, and you may want to add more honey. I also use vanilla bean paste because I like to see the vanilla beans in the cream, but you can use vanilla extract, too.

~ Strawberry Tart ~

For the Crust

1 1/2 cups flour
1/2 cup powdered sugar
1/4 tsp fine sea salt
9 tablespoons cold unsalted butter
1 large egg, beaten

For the Filling

1 cup mascarpone 
1/2 cup creme fraiche
2 tablespoons honey
2 teaspoons vanilla bean paste
1 pound strawberries, hulled and sliced

To make the tart shell:

Cut the butter into four slices lengthwise, turn, and make another four lengthwise cuts. Cut the butter crosswise, making 1/4 inch or so incisions. Put your butter cubes onto a plate and refrigerate (if your kitchen is warm - if, say, you live in Memphis and it's toasty out, bypass the fridge and go straight for the freezer. 

Sift the dry ingredients together in a medium-sized mixing bowl. Add the chilled butter, toss with the flour mixture, and work the butter in with your hands. Press the butter cubes flat with your fingers, creating oatmeal-type flakes. It's okay to have big and little pieces (actually, it's a good thing). Continue until most of the butter cubes have been pressed flat.

If the butter feels soft and warm, put the mixing bowl into the fridge to allow the butter to firm back up (this helps preserve a flaky crust). After 10 minutes, remove the bowl and add the egg. With a fork, lightly stir the egg in and keep tossing until a shaggy dough just begins to form. Use your hands to press and turn the dough within the bowl, working just until the dough holds. Form the dough into a disk, wrap with plastic wrap, and allow the dough to rest for an our, or overnight. 

Before you roll out the dough, remove the dough disk from the fridge and let it warm a bit, about 20 minutes or so. Roll it between sheets of plastic wrap until it's about 3/16ths of an inch in thickness. Tuck the plastic wrap around the edges and refrigerate the dough sheet for 15-30 minutes.

Butter the tart pan. If you're using a pie pan, use the pie pan as a rough guide to cut parchment paper to line the bottom - trim it to fit, and butter both the pie pan and the parchment paper. If you're using a 9x9, use parchment paper to line both the bottom and the sides - it'll help make it possible to lift from the pan.

Press the dough into the tart pan and trim the edges; use the trimmings to patch any holes that may have formed. Use a fork to score holes across the bottom. Refrigerate - yes, again - the dough in the tart pan for 30-60 minutes. 

While the dough is refrigerating, center an oven rack and preheat the oven to 375 degrees. 

Bake the shell for 15-20 minutes - you want the crust nice and brown, but check on it at the 15 minute mark to make sure the top edge doesn't get too brown. Remove from the oven and allow to cool fully before filling (a wire rack is great for that, you can often find them discounted at Homegoods or Tuesday Morning). 

To make the filling:

Stir the mascarpone, creme fraiche, honey, and vanilla bean paste together. Spoon the filling into the cooled tart shell; if you're making minis, put the filling into a Ziplock bag, cut off the tip, and pipe the filling in. Arrange the strawberry slices on top and serve immediately. 

I hope you enjoy the tart! It's perfect for a summer get-together. And I really, really hope you enjoy Jane of Austin - happy reading!


What are you looking forward to eating and reading this summer? 
Share in the comments below!

Jane Austen Week!

$
0
0


I'm so excited for this week! In honor of the 200th Anniversary of Jane Austen's passing, this week is going to be five straight days of Austen-y goodness, celebrating her work and it's centuries-long impact. 




On Monday, I'll kick things off with a delicious scone recipe (as I do) and information about how to enter to win the Jane of Austinprize package, offered by WaterBrook Multnomah.



On Tuesday, author Kathleen A. Flynn of The Jane Austen Project is going to share about her thoughts on Jane's legacy and how she combined literary historical fiction with time travel. I recently finished reading the book, and had a great time getting to pick Kathleen's brain about her thoughts and process. She'll be giving away a copy of the book as well!



On Wednesday, Teri Wilson is going to swing by and tell us about her novel, Unleashing Mr. Darcy. She'll also share about the process of having her novels developed into a Hallmark Original Movie (twice!) and what it was like to be a part of the judging process for Miss America. Would Miss America impress Miss Bingley? Find out what Teri thinks on Wednesday! She'll also be giving away copies of Unleashing Mr. Darcy as well as her latest book,It Started With A Diamond.





On Thursday, join me on my Facebook Author Page as we watch the 1995 adaptation of Sense & Sensibility! We did it last year with Chocolat and had a great time, so join us as we enjoy Emma Thompson's Oscar-winning screenplay, Kate Winslet's impassioned turn as Marianne, and Hugh Grant's floppy hair. And as always, come for the movie, stay for the book giveaway!



Katherine Reay, award-winning author of Dear Mr. Knightleyand Lizzy & Jane wraps up the festivities on Friday, sharing about Jane Austen's influence on her writing.

On top of everything on the blog, there will be a special Austen-edition of my newsletter this week, so be sure to subscribe if you haven't already!  Can't wait to chat Austen with everybody!
\

Which Austen novel is your favorite? Share in the comments!

Jane Austen Week: Day 1 - Chamomile & Lavender Scones

$
0
0
It's the first day of Jane Austen week! You can click here to see the full schedule of events - I'm really excited.

To kick it off, I'll admit I spent some time thinking about what to say. After all, I've spent a lot of time lately writing about what Austen's work meant to me, and what makes her so enticing to adapt.

So rather than say more just now, I decided to pivot and share a scone that almost made it into the book.

Originally there were three scone recipes in the book, and I nixed this one, and after testing it this week - well, I'm glad I get to share it here!


Honestly, these could have gone badly. Flowers can be tricky to utilize in food sometimes - use the wrong amounts and the effect is unpleasant. But these are a fairly standard cream scone, kicked up with a hefty dose of ground chamomile tea and dried lavender buds. For a more traditional scone, serve with Devonshire cream. But for my money, I'd top them with a light vanilla glaze that kicks the sweetness up a notch. If you do both, I won't tell.

~ Chamomile and Lavender Scones ~

1 tablespoon plus 1/4 teaspoon dried lavender
1 tablespoon plus 1/4 teaspoon chamomile tea
2 cups flour, plus more for rolling out
1 tablespoon baking powder
½ teaspoon fine sea salt
½ cup sugar
5 tablespoons cold butter, cut into small cubes
1 cup heavy cream

1 cup powdered sugar
3-4 tablespoons whole milk
1/4 tsp vanilla bean paste (vanilla extract is fine, you just won't get the specks of vanilla bean)

Place a baking rack at the center of the oven and preheat  the oven to 425 degrees. Line a baking sheet with parchment paper.

Grind the lavender and chamomile to a fine powder in a spice grinder (see note below). In a large mixing bowl, whisk together the lavender, chamomile, flour, baking powder, salt, and sugar.

Add the butter, tossing the cubes with the flour mixture and flattening the small cubes with your fingers, rubbing some of the butter into the flour - you want a mix of butter pieces that look like quick oats and pieces that look more like dimes. If you kitchen is on the warm side and the butter feels soft, freeze the butter and flower for a few minutes, until the butter firms back up. 

Add cream and stir with a wooden spoon or sturdy spatula until a dough forms. Place the dough onto a floured surface. Form the dough into a circle and roll the top flat, about 3/4 of an inch thick.

For round scones, use a biscuit cutter or a water glass to cut circles from the dough. Place the circles onto the baking sheet, and baking for 10-15 minutes until lightly golden.

As the scones cool, mix powdered sugar with the honey and warm milk, splashing the milk into the mixture until a stirable mixture forms. Allow the glaze to set before serving. 

Makes about 6-8 scones.

Note: for best results, I recommend using a spice grinder to blend the tea and buds into a fine powder. And by "spice grinder," I mean a cheap coffee grinder that you solemnly swear never to use with coffee beans.

Last but not least...



...my publisher has put together a beautiful giveaway package to celebrate the release of Jane of Austin! Click here to enter!


What kind of scone do you enjoy to bake or eat (or both!) - share in the comments!



Jane Austen Week: Day 2 - Q&A with Kathleen A. Flynn

$
0
0
Welcome to Jane Austen Week, Day 2!

One of the many pleasures of being a writer is getting to meet other writers. I haven't had the pleasure of getting to meet author Kathleen A. Flynn in person, but I was a third of the way through her debut novel, The Jane Austen Project, when I was in the planning stages of Jane Austen Week.

With its mix of Jane Austen, time travel, and philosophical speculation, it landed squarely in my reading sweet spot. In a nutshell, time travelers Rachel Katzman and Liam Finucane are sent to 1815 to recover Jane Austen's letters to her sister Cassandra, as well as a previously undiscovered completed manuscript. But their objective becomes messy as they become involved with Jane's social circle and begin to notice small changes in the historical timeline. And after a while, Rachel  a doctor  begins to wrestle with the mysterious illness that ultimately takes Jane's life.

Intrigued? So was I! After all, Jane Austen Week is all about the 200th Anniversary of Jane's passing; a celebration of her life's work. And because the plot of The Jane Austen Project centers very much on Jane's life, the looming reality of her death, and what might have happened if history had unfolded differently, I'm thrilled Kathleen could participate!





Hillary Manton Lodge: The Jane Austen Project opens in what feels like the near future. While you’re very specific about the historical dates, Rachel and Liam’s present day is hazier. Why is that? When do you think they’re originally from?

Kathleen A. Flynn: Great question! I wanted to be very specific about 1815 and more vague about the world Rachel and Liam had come from, because I wanted to leave some space for the reader’s imagination to roam. And because I did not want the story to be about the world they came from. Their world is not our world at some point in the future; it would be more helpful to think of it as an alternate possible world, where certain features of our own world are taken to a logical (or absurd) extreme.

HML: Almost immediately upon arriving in Regency England, Rachel and Liam come across a grisly remainder of local justice. The stakes are high from the very beginning, and we’re very aware that this isn’t the BBC’s 19th century England. What were your intentions when it came to writing a portrayal of that time period?

KAF: I was interested in challenging the romantic, idealized image of life in Regency England. Especially because of the dominance of movie versions of Austen’s novels, it’s easy to picture life there as quite idyllic. Which it was in some ways, particularly if you were rich, and a man, and white, and the proper sort of Protestant. But even for those fortunate ones, there were a lot of unpleasant, unsanitary aspects of life that the movies – and Austen novels too – tend to gloss over. I wanted to explore how all this would seem to someone not used to it, which was why I needed time travelers.

HML: I can see that - Rachel in particular functions really well as an audience surrogate, but is still interesting in her own right. The blend of genres works really well. As both a work of science fiction and historical fiction, what kind of research did The Jane Austen Project involve?

KAF: Rachel and Liam are new to 1815 – they take nothing for granted, and we are seeing this world through their eyes. I needed to know things like what people ate, how they traveled around, bought clothing, and found servants. I researched what the customs of socializing would have been, the state of medicine at that time, and what the Austen family would have been doing at this particular moment in history, when I wanted to insert some visitors into their lives. 

Jane Austen’s work itself, though not much help on things like cookery or hiring a servant, is impressively precise about social stuff, full of telling little details that are easy to read over unless you are looking for them. Like the social significance of what time of day people eat their main meal, or who drives a curricle vs. who drives a barouche.

There is a certain amount of science in my story, but not a lot. I was interested in creating a plausible-seeming, logically consistent method of time travel (no magic), but I did not want to go into too much detail about it. Certain ideas already part of the furniture of my mind – from having studied physics (at a very basic level) in college and currently working with people who know a lot about data science and statistics – got a little more airing and research, and a chance to be playful.

HML: I felt it was just the right amount - enough to answer questions, but not so much that it overran the characterizations or relationships, especially since those relationships are so crucial to the book's main themes. When it comes to those relationships, in what ways do you feel that Rachel’s relationships with Henry and Liam echo Austen’s marriage plots?

KAF: I wanted my story to honor Austen’s novels and yet not try to imitate them too slavishly. I’m fascinated by how Austen turns the marriage plot to her own ends, using it as a vehicle of self-discovery for her heroines. In Rachel’s relationships with Henry and Liam I’ve tried to have something like this.

Also in Austen there is so often what we might call the false love interest and the true one: think of Wickham/Darcy, Willoughby/Brandon, Thorpe/Tilney, Crawford/Bertram, Churchill/Knightley Elliot/Wentworth. The false love interest might be a foil to the true one, an obstacle, a distraction. But somehow, the false always points the way to the true, and this is something I tried to do in my story also.

HML: In many ways, Rachel – with her career, her independence, and her modern frankness about her sexuality – feels like the anti-Austen protagonist. Tell us about your intentions with her character.

KAF: One thing that struck me in thinking about Jane Austen as a person was how incredibly brilliant she must have been, with such a limited outlet for her abilities, and how well she managed to function within those restraints. I imagined how frustrating it must have been to be a woman of that time – any woman, but especially a genius. And how much more frustrating for a modern woman to travel to the past and voluntarily submit to this life. 

To be a person who chooses to travel in time, you have to be pretty bold and adventurous, yet as a woman be willing to suppress all that in the interests of the mission. It seemed like a good setup for conflict. I wanted Rachel to be competent and feisty and forthright about sex because all those things put her in collision with 1815. I was also intrigued by the challenges she presented as my first-person narrator. She’s very perceptive in many ways, but she also has some blind spots.

HML: Which Austen character do you feel Rachel most resembles?

KAF: She has some elements of several: She’s a bit like Elizabeth in her self-confidence and sense of humor, like Emma in her capacity for self-deception about certain important things, such as her true feelings about Liam and her own fear of emotional intimacy. The setup of Rachel and Liam coming to London has many echoes of Mansfield Park, which makes her like Mary Crawford – and she does play that worldly temptress role with Henry.

HML: You’ve been a longtime Austen reader and member of JASNA. What has it been like to write Austen-inspired fiction?

KAF: Both fun and intimidating. When I got the idea to write this book, years ago now, I was a longtime fan of Austen but not obsessed to the degree I became subsequently. It’s been great to immerse myself in this world, and in Austen’s work, but I did not quite realize what I was getting myself into, when I began. Exactly how much of a genius Austen really was – and therefore how perilous to take on in homage. Also, just how much Austen-inspired fiction there is, and therefore what a challenge to try to be original.

HML: I hear you on that! So, much of The Jane Austen Project deals with the death of Jane Austen, what may have caused it, and how Rachel’s present is affected by it. One of the ideas you present is the thought that had Austen lived long enough to be prolific, she wouldn’t have enjoyed the fanatical popularity she does now. Why do you think that might be?

KAF: Anthony Trollope was someone I discovered only in the course of writing this book – I’d heard of him, but somehow had never read him. When I read The Way We Live Now, I was blown away – I could not believe I had missed out on such a wonderful writer all this time. As I learned more about him, how disciplined he was about writing, and how prolific, it struck me that maybe part of his problem in the literary afterlife was that there was too much of him to get a grip on. In our time we see this with Joyce Carol Oates, for example.

Whereas with Austen it is quite contained – it’s possible to study her entire work in considerable detail. There’s not one of her books that people say, well it’s not as good as the others. I wondered if she had lived longer, and written more, would this still have been true? I can’t picture her cutting corners just to finish a book quickly and make money, but she might have experimented and taken directions that disappointed some of her fans, the way Henry James got more and more obscure in his writing style, for instance. 

I think in general it’s true that when there is a lot of something, we tend to place less of a value on it, and it amused me to think this could happen even with Austen. I am not entirely sure I believe it, though. And frankly, like Rachel, I would take the risk, for 17 additional Jane Austen novels.


HML: How do you feel our current reality might be different if we had that greater library of Austen’s work?

KAF: Haha, I don’t know. I’d like to think it would be a better world, like we could have prevented the disaster of World War I or something, that reading more Austen would have made us all more insightful as a culture. But that might be putting too much faith in the power of literature.

HML: During your day job, you edit for the New York Times Upshot section. How did your journalism background help prepare you for writing/publishing fiction? What about publication surprised you?

KAF: As a novelist yourself, I am sure you know how you are always kind of living on two levels – the day-to-day reality of life, and the imaginary world that is playing out in the background of your mind all the time, and in the foreground when you sit down to write. Before I started working at The Upshot, and for much of the period I was working on The Jane Austen Project, I was a copy editor on the Foreign/National desk, which meant I might find myself editing stories about a whole range of topics, anything you might find in the A-section of the paper. I had to read the newspaper very closely every day, because I needed to know what had already happened to be able to see that day’s news in context. So I had all these current events in my brain, which the world of 1815 was such a welcome contrast with.

Daily journalism, especially for a copy editor, typically has a very short time horizon – you work on a story intensely, but then it’s over and published, and you go on to something else. Learning to think in the long time frame of writing a novel was a challenge for me. Also, I was quite struck by how slowly everything happens in the world of book publishing – this makes sense, but it was still surprising.

HML: I get that  especially after the pace of print journalism! Kathleen, thank you so much for your work on The Jane Austen Project, and for coming to the blog this week!


Readers - use the form below to enter to win a signed copy of The Jane Austen Project!





Jane Austen Week: Day 3 - Q&A with Teri Wilson

$
0
0
Welcome to Day 3 of Jane Austen Week! To recap briefly, on Day 1 I shared the recipe for chamomile and lavender scones, as well as the link to the All Things Jane Giveaway. On Day 2, I got  chat Jane Austen and time travel with author Kathleen A. Flynn.

Today, I'm thrilled to be hosting Teri Wilson, author of Unleashing Mr. Darcy!

Teri came onto my radar via an elderly neighbor from our Vancouver, Washington neighborhood. I'd been gardening and doing yard work with my mom in the front yard and had Shiloh and puppy Sylvie tethered near the front door. The neighborhood's bank of mailboxes was just to the left of our house, and I met most of my neighbors over there. That day a sweet, elderly lady from two doors down introduced herself and, after a fashion, remarked on Shiloh and Sylvie.

"They look just like the dogs from that movie, that Hallmark movie," she said. "The Mr. Darcy movie."

As you can imagine, my ears perked up. Cavaliers? Mr. Darcy?

I did some creative Googling later and discovered that Unleashing Mr. Darcy was indeed a Hallmark Original Movie - which would be re-airing in a couple weeks - and was based on a book by Teri Wilson.

Who has two cavaliers.


So - you can imagine my enjoyment in reading Teri's novel and then watching Unleashing Mr. Darcy off of my DVR - especially when it came to getting to see cavies on TV! I'm extra thrilled to have Teri on the blog today, as a fellow Austen-adapter and cavalier-keeper.

Hillary Manton Lodge: Thanks so much for joining in today! Because this is Austen Week, let’s start with Unleashing Mr. Darcy. Where did the idea of Pride & Prejudice set in the dog-show world come from?

Teri Wilson: I first got the idea for Unleashing Mr. Darcy when I was at a dog show. I have two Cavalier King Charles Spaniels named Bliss and Finn, just like the dogs in Unleashing. When they were very young, I showed them in conformation dog shows. I was a dog show novice. Honestly, I was pretty terrible at it - I was always very nervous in the ring. There’s a lot of downtime at shows, and at one point, I was re-reading Pride & Prejudice ringside and I just started thinking about what it would be like if Mr. Darcy were the judge and how terrifying that would be. I started imagining all the conversations he and Elizabeth could have if she were showing her dog in his ring. I thought about the book for months before I decided to actually write it. I thought it was such a niche idea that no one would want to read it. Thank goodness I was wrong.

HML: I love how writer's brain works! That's so great. Tell us about your history with Jane Austen’s stories, then. Which ones are your favorites?

TW: I never really read them until I was an adult. I fell, fast and hard. I read them all, and then I started in on all the modern, Austen-inspired novels. Isn’t it amazing how she’s become an entire sub-genre now? It’s probably obvious that Pride & Prejudice is my favorite. But honestly, I love them all. I’ve toyed with the idea of doing a retelling of Persuasion. “Half agony, half hope.” Swoon.

HML: Your Donovan Darcy – a billionaire dog breeder, naturally – is based on Austen’s Fitzwilliam Darcy (also very wealthy, probably also had dogs). Why do you think the character of Darcy is so popular, decade after decade?

TW: Darcy was the original romantic hero. He was the first, and in a way, he’s the inspiration for all the other romantic heroes in literature (particularly the alpha heroes). He’s charming when he wants to be, but he’s generally pretty haughty. Only Elizabeth brings out his softer side. No one else. I think that’s what makes him so appealing as a book boyfriend. Who wouldn’t want to have that kind of affect on a man like Darcy? (At least on the pages of a book.)

HML: I love how, in Pride & Prejudice, Elizabeth teases Darcy and his sister, Georgiana, just kind of goggles at her. Nobody else had every thought to tease him like that, and I don't think he'd much take it from anyone else - that was one of her super powers. In what ways are your Elizabeth Scott and Austen’s Elizabeth Bennet similar? How are they different?

TW: They both move about in a world of privilege, but come from families that aren’t necessarily wealthy. They’re both headstrong, smart and independent heroines. They both enter into their first interactions with Mr. Darcy full of assumptions about what sort of man he is. As far as differences, my Elizabeth probably likes dogs a lot more than the original Elizabeth Bennet does. Haha! She’s also a bit more modern in that she’s taken steps to become financially independent from her family. Her independence becomes threatened though, and that’s when things get complicated.

HML: Pride & Prejudice finds new readers generation after generation, remaining an enduring classic. Why do you think that is?

TW: I always say that the classics become classics for a reason. They touch on universal themes that people throughout time can identify with. I think many women see themselves in Elizabeth Bennet. She’s bookish and witty and independent. She cares deeply about her family, embarrassing as they may be. But she’s not the prettiest or the richest or most popular girl around. I think she taps into the underdog in all of us. And Mr. Darcy is just so perfect…“You must allow me to tell you how ardently I admire and love you.” Siiiigh. I firmly believe those words will never lose their power.

HML: Okay – the big question. Do you prefer the 1995 miniseries or the 2005 film?

TW: Don’t make me choose! It could seriously go either way on any given day. I used to say Colin Firth was my favorite Darcy, but that changed when Unleashing Mr. Darcy was made into a movie for the Hallmark Channel. Ryan Paevey will always be my favorite Darcy now, because he’s mine.

HML: I love that! You get your own personal Darcy! So tell us more about the adaption of Unleashing Mr. Darcy into a Hallmark Original Movie. What was that process like? What was the most fun for you?

TW: The entire experience was completely surreal in all the best ways. I was so overwhelmed with joy at every stage of the process that I burst into tears all the time. Every single day. I’m not kidding. I was actually afraid to go on set because I thought I’d be a weepy mess. I managed to hold it together until the crew gave me my own director’s chair with my name on it. Then I cried like a baby. It’s a very humbling experience to have something you’ve made up in your head become an actual, real thing. And I’m so pleased with the finished film. I love everything about it, from Ryan as Darcy (perfection!) to the dogs. The most fun for me was definitely being on set. I’ve loved movies my entire life, and being involved with my own was an experience I will always treasure.

HML: Recently, you got to judge beauty pageants in Florida – clearly you are living your best life. Tell us more about that! Do you think the contestants were accomplished enough to impress Caroline Bingley?

TW: Can you believe I got to judge the Miss United States pageant? It just happened a week ago, so I’m not even sure I’ve wrapped my head around it yet! I was really surprised (and so completely thrilled) to receive the invitation to judge a huge national pageant. I write a lot of non-fiction articles about fashion for HelloGiggles.com and it’s no secret that I’ve never met a tiara I didn’t like, and I think those two things contributed to the invite. The Miss United States pageant is the same pageant that was featured in the Miss Congeniality movies. (It’s real!) I had the best time. I was so looking forward to it, but honestly, it exceeded my expectations. I was excited about the fashion aspect and all the glamour, but it was very inspiring and much more emotional than I anticipated.

The pageant is platform-based, and in the personal interview portion, I got to speak with the contestants about their community involvement and the volunteer work they do to support their platforms. I was so impressed with all the wonderful things those young women do to help others as well as with their grace and speaking ability, especially the teenagers. It was quite remarkable. The young lady who won the Jr. Teen portion of the pageant is a brain cancer survivor and will be such an inspiration to girls her age. There were several contestants in the adult division who are active duty military. It was a very empowering experience. I dare say, even Caroline Bingley would have been astounded.



HML: Since Unleashing Mr. Darcy, you’ve released a Romeo & Juliet adaptation (Unmasking Juliet) and a My Fair Lady adaptation (The Art of Us, also adapted by Hallmark). Do you have other literature-inspired projects in the works?

TW: I don’t have any classic literature retellings in the works right now, but all three books in my series The Royals for Pocket Star Books are contemporary adaptations of classic movies. Royally Roma is based on the Audrey Hepburn film, Roman Holiday. Book 2 in the series, Royally Romanov, was inspired by Anastasia (more on that below!). The series ends in November with Royally Wed, which is loosely based on the Fred Astaire film Royal Wedding. I adore old black and white movies, so I had the best time writing these books.

HML: I love that idea! But yes, tell us more about Royally Romanov - there was a time when I was particularly fascinated by the Russian royal family, so I'm excited about that one.

TW: Royally Romanov is a contemporary romance inspired by the story of the Grand Duchess Anastasia. The heroine, a museum curator, falls for a mysterious man who may or may not be a long lost heir to Russian's imperial Romanov dynasty. I’m so excited about this book because I’ve always been intrigued by the Romanovs and I’m a huge fan of the animated Anastasia movie!

HML: That's so fun, I'm really looking forward to that one! What are the best places for readers to connect with you on social media?

TW: I love interacting with readers! You can find me at my website, as well as Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter.

HML: For reals, dear readers, I promise Teri is worth the follow. It's a feast of dog pics and tiaras and joy. Thanks so much for joining in on Austen Week, Teri!

Readers - two things before you go. First, use the form below to enter to win a signed copies of Unleashing Mr. Darcy and It Started With A Diamond

Second, don't forgetthat tomorrow night is the Sense & Sensibility Watch-Along!Visit the event page for details.







Jane Austen Week: Day 4 - Reflections on Sense & Sensibility

$
0
0
As  Jane Austen Week wraps, I felt like there was a hole here on the blog for Day 4 and I wanted to shore it up.

As part of the official festivities, we watched Sense & Sensibility together - even if you didn't get to participate, you may enjoy reading over the threads! It was a lot of fun, and I'll do something similar again another time.

Watching the movie over again reminded me of my experience reading Sense & Sensibility in preparation for the writing of Jane of Austin. You see, when I was first tapped to write Jane, all I had was a title. From there, I had free reign to go anywhere I liked.

I hadn't read Sense & Sensibility yet - I'd read Pride & Prejudice, Emma, and Persuasion. But I knew I wanted to write a more rebellious, headstrong character than I'd been writing for the last several years. Of Austen's likable rebels, Marianne was the strongest choice - unlike other rebels (*cough* Lydia *cough*), Marianne gets an entire redemption arc. She learns, she grows, and she's offered a chance at happiness.





But it's not an easy book to adapt. Much of the story - not unlike Pride & Prejudice - is a critique on the English tradition of primogeniture. Not unlike the Bennet sisters, the Dashwoods missed out on having any protections not only because they were daughters, but because they were half-sisters of the heir. Their sudden loss of fortune was exactly the eventuality that Mrs. Bennet worked to prevent for her own daughters.

It's a story of the series of men who have failed the Dashwood women in one way or another - their father, their half-brother, by Willoughby - who falls in love with Marianne but marries another for money. Even Edward, in his failure to tell Elinor sooner of his prior attachment to Lucy Steele, causes Elinor undue angst for the bulk of the novel.

Emma Thompson's ability to write Edward into a shy beta hero is nothing short of remarkable; in the novel, he visits Barton Cottage but spends his time distract and unhappy, fingering a piece of jewelry we later discover was gifted by Lucy. It's Mrs. Dashwood who counsels him choose his own path.
But there are bright spots for the Dashwood ladies - there's Sir John, who's happy to rent the cottage on his estate to his cousin and her family on easy terms. There's Mrs. Jennings, who - yes, is a gossip - but she also offers to take the elder Dashwood girls to London where they might find husbands. 

And then there's Colonel Brandon. 

The Colonel, we learn, was once disappointed in love, seeing his sweetheart married to his brother, and caring for that woman's illegitimate child after her divorce - setting her up in the country, very much as Harriet Smith had been. But rather than find happiness with a local farmer, the girl is seduced by Willoughby; it's Brandon who finds her, who challenges Willoughby to a duel, who provides. He's a romantic, and his second chance at happiness arrives in the form of Marianne.

The second chance trope is one that Austen reaches for more than once. It's at the center of Persuasion, as well as the third act of Pride & Prejudice. That both Brandon and Marianne can make the most of it is one of the truest pleasures of the novel. 

Thompson's other marvel, in the film, is giving voice to the Dashwood sisters. There's a great deal of dialogue in Pride & Prejudice that crosses from page to screen easily; likewise Emma. But in Sense & Sensibility, the characters talk around Elinor and Marianne - we are told they respond, but their voices don't appear on the page. Is it a stylistic choice? A tool to show how little voice either sister had in her own life? Either say, Thompson's screenplay provides them with words that feel so Austen-esque that you wouldn't know they're not original to the book.

The film is a pleasure, as is the original novel. I hope you've had the chance to enjoy them, and if not, will be able to do so soon. Because even though we live in a time when a woman can publish a book in her own name without risking notoriety, the people are largely the same. Money will never not be a part of our social construct; love and happiness will always be complicated by our own choices. 

Like I said, if you haven't read the novel and enjoyed the original - I highly recommend it. It's more challenging than the film, but its pleasures are rich and deep. Every time I got stuck in Jane, I could reliably open the book and find that Austen had something lovely inside, waiting for me. 



If you'd like a copy of your own, make sure to enter the All Things Jane Giveaway if you haven't yet! And if you've read it, let me know what you thought of it in the comments!


Jane Austen Week: Day 5 - Katherine Reay & the Austen Legacy

$
0
0
I'm sad to see Jane Austen Week come to a close - I've had such a great time!

To help bring things to a close, I've invited Katherine Reay to come and share about Jane Austen's impact on her own writing. It's a gorgeous essay, so I suggest getting a cup of tea settling in to enjoy the read.

This is a wonderful week to enjoy Jane Austen! In pondering her influence on my life – thinking, reading and writing – I cast back to my middle school years.

I first encountered Austen in eighth grade. Her “romance” initially attracted me. Darcy and Elizabeth (Pride and Prejudice), with their misunderstandings, stops and starts; Wentworth (Persuasion) living in half agony, half hope; Knightley (Emma) loving Emma enough to let her go… Her stories felt like fairytales. While Austen’s wit focused on the hypocrisies, limitations and realities within her time, I viewed her novels with rosy idealism. For a thirteen-year-old, Darcy was my Prince Charming and Miss Bingley, an Ugly Stepsister.


Thirty years later, that is not the aspect of Austen’s brilliance that holds my attention. My own contemporary-based writing (Dear Mr. Knightley, Lizzy & Jane, and The Austen Escape) allude to her works again and again, not because of the romance, but because of her continued relevance, her deep well of understanding regarding human nature. Austen knows us and that acumen has forged a common language we share.

She continues to show me, in deftly drawn words and unparalleled acuity, that human nature is static. We will always get things wrong; we will always carry prejudice, look out for our own interests, demonstrate beautiful loyalty, stand firm, and rise above with the truest sacrificial instincts. She shows me what I know to be true – sibling love is powerful and a gift; sibling rivalry undeniable; families are for life; and real love exists. 


And within her books, I met people I cross paths with on a daily basis: Wickhams, Caroline Bingleys, Lydias and Marys. And a few people I cherish as well – Lizzys, Janes, and Georgianas. Charlottes are also in my life and writing too– good friends with whom I may not agree all the time, but I get them and they understand me equally well. We rub shoulders with these people– we are these people. Austen communicated the unfaltering truth of human nature in a transient environment. The drawing rooms have changed – the hearts have not.

And her brilliance not only lies in her recognition of human nature, but her skill in revealing it. Austen didn’t dazzle us with adventures, mysteries, or intrigue. Her characters stayed in their villages and moved through kitchens, ballrooms and life. She met them where we meet ourselves. And that is an unending process. We are continually redefining ourselves and discovering new things within us in those small moments of life. We encounter that time, again and again, as Lucy Alling from The Bronte Plot, defines: “That time when you don’t know where you’ll be, but you can’t stay as you are.”

We saw it in Pride and Prejudice when Lizzy declared “Till this moment I never knew myself.” Or in Persuasion when Wentworth seizes pen and paper and pours out his heart… “I can listen no longer in silence. I must speak to you by such means as are within my reach. You pierce my soul. I am half agony, half hope.” We see it in each of her stories as we see it in each of our lives – our preconceptions and prejudges get swiped away in the bright, sometimes harsh, light of reality.


While I touched upon this in Dear Mr. Knightley and in Lizzy & Jane, employing allusions to Austen’s work as a way to reveal motivation and character in a manner we understand, I dug more deeply into her popularity, power and our appropriation of her stories in The Austen Escape. It was great fun to examine her meteoric rise to popularity in our modern culture over the past couple decades, and the explosion of research around her books, word choice, and continued literary influence.

Perhaps, in the end, G.K. Chesterton got it right when he wrote, "No woman later has captured the complete common sense of Jane Austen. She could keep her head, while all the after women went about looking for their brains." While I contend he judged the rest of us a bit harshly, he too expressed an enduring truth.

No one writes like Miss Austen.




I love this essay! Thanks so much, Katherine, for sharing. Readers - Katherine is giving away a copy each of Dear Mr. Knightlyand Lizzy & Jane. Use the form below to enter!





Restorative Chicken Soup

$
0
0

Most of the recipes that show up here are ones I've developed and tweaked, and this one is not different. But if you've got the current issue of Real Simple on your sofa, this'll look familiar. I was flipping through and found it the day Danny's parents arrived from Oregon, and thought, "we should eat that."

But I tweaked it (as I do) and will probably tweak it some more, but it's definitely going into regular rotation. First, I would hesitate to call it a taco soup because - I don't know. It's not exactly taco innards. Mexican-ish chicken soup? At any rate, I used a mix of chicken breasts and chicken legs, for body. I also used a bit more corn, and would use even more next time. I wouldn't be opposed to more black beans, either.

And I topped it with avocado, because WHY WOULDN'T YOU. AVOCADO. (Ahem). I also like crumbling tortilla chips into my Mexican-flavored soups, and some cilantro won't go amiss.

A couple tips - use gloves when handling the jalapeno peppers, and if you don't have gloves, use plastic sandwich bags. It's cheap, but it does the job - which is keeping the capsaicin off your hands.

This is definitely a "this is super easy once the prep work is done" kind of recipe, but a food processor makes much faster work of it. I recommend mincing the seeded jalapeno together with the onion. You can add the bell pepper after and process it, if you want it small, or chop it by hand separately.

I also pulsed the tomatoes in the processor - Danny doesn't do chunky tomatoes (and I don't care much for them, either). Resist the temptation to skip straight to the crushed tomatoes and stick with the canned fire-roasted tomatoes - you'll want the hint of smokiness, and they puree up in a pinch.

All of that to say - if you like the ingredients, you'll like the soup.  And if you happen to have leftovers in the fridge when you come down with a cold (speaking from experience), you'll be thankful to have them!

Adapted from Real Simple

For the Soup:

6 cups chicken stock
2 boneless, skinless chicken breasts
2-3 boneless, skinless chicken thighs, fat trimmed off
1 large yellow onion, chopped fine.
1 jalapeno pepper, seeded and chopped fine.
1 red or orange bell pepper, chopped
1 15-oz can diced fire-roasted tomatoes (optional: puree)
2 15-oz cans black beans, drained and rinsed
12 oz frozen corn
Juice of 2 limes
2 tablespoons ground cumin
2 tablespoons chili powder
1 tsp sea salt
Cracked black pepper to taste

For Serving:

Sliced avocado, cheddar or Monterey Jack cheese, sour cream, tortilla chips, and/or sliced jalapeno

Place all soup ingredients into a slow cooker, stir, and cook on low for 10 hours. Remove the chicken with a slotted spoon before serving, and rough chop/shred it before replacing it to serve. Top with desired toppings, and enjoy. Serves 8.

What's your favorite end-of-summer soup? Share in the comments!


Inspirational Contemporary Romance Bundle Giveaway!

$
0
0

Exciting news! Booksweeps is holding a super huge giveaway, and Jane of Austin is one of the books in the prize package! See all the included books below and click here to enter.




Jane of Austin - The Playlist!

$
0
0

Want to experience the music of Jane of Austin? I've put together a Spotify playlist with the songs and bands mentioned in the book, songs they listened to on their road trip, and music they might have heard at SxSW. Give it a listen - you might find some old favorites and make new discoveries! Click below to enjoy. 



Which songs do you enjoy? Which ones would you add? Share in the comments!

Pumpkin Scones with Chai Glaze for Fall

$
0
0

Who's ready for fall? After a long - though admittedly mild, by southern standards - Memphis summer, I'm ready. And for about 48 hours, it felt like fall...and then it was back to highs in the 90's. So clearly, the solution is to make my own autumn, and that means homemade pumpkin scones.



They bake up moist and gorgeous, and the black tea in the icing makes them extra special. If you like your scones extra spice-forward, go ahead and increase the spices by half. 

~ Pumpkin Scones with Spiced Chai Icing ~

For the Scones

1/2 cup canned plain pumpkin

2 tablespoons whole milk

1 egg

6 tablespoons cold butter, cut into very small pieces

2 cups all-purpose flour

Scant cup sugar

1 tablespoon baking powder

1⁄2 teaspoon salt

1 teaspoon cinnamon

1⁄2 teaspoon nutmeg

1⁄4 teaspoon cloves

1⁄4 teaspoon ginger



For the Glaze



1 cup powdered sugar

2 tablespoons whole milk


For the Chai Icing



1 cup powdered sugar + 3 tablespoons powdered sugar

2 tablespoons whole milk

1/4 tsp black tea, very finely ground

1⁄4 teaspoon cinnamon

1⁄8 teaspoon nutmeg

1 pinch ginger

1 pinch clove



To make the Scones



Preheat the oven to 425°F. Line a baking sheet with parchment paper.



Cut the butter into small, 1/6-inch sized pieces, and place the cut pieces into the freezer.

Whisk together the pumpkin, whole milk, and egg. Set aside.


Stir the flour, sugar, baking powder, salt, and spices together in a large mixing bowl. Using your hands, rub the butter into the flour mixture until the mixture resembles small peas.



Fold in the pumpkin mixture, stirring just until a shaggy dough forms.



Turn the dough out onto a floured pastry cloth or silicone baking mat. Knead the dough for three or four turns, and then form it into a long rectangle, about 3/4-inch thick. With a large knife, cut the dough into three squares, and then cut each square into two triangles. If you want smaller snack-sized scones, cut the squares into quarters.



Place the scones onto the lined baking sheet, and bake for about 15 minutes, or until the scones are lightly browned on top. Allow to cool fully (otherwise, the glaze will melt right off).



To prepare the glaze, stir together the milk and powdered sugar. Brush over cooled scones. For the spiced icing, stir together all ingredients. To pipe over the scones, you can use a pastry bag and a tip, or simply spoon the icing into a zipper storage bag and cut the tip of one corner off. Drizzle over each scone in a zigzag pattern; allow to set before serving.



Makes six large scones, or twelve small ones.

Do you live somewhere warm? How do you make autumn for yourself?
Share in the comments below!

New Etsy Shop & Graphic Giveaway!

$
0
0


Guess what - I’ve opened an Etsy shop! If you’re not one of the people who’s had their ear talked off about my love for graphic art and design, this might take you by surprise. (And if you have had your ear talked off, well, thank you for your patience!)

Social media changed between the releases of my second and third novels (Simply Sara and A Table by the Window, if you’re counting). I started designing my own marketing graphics during my first release with WaterBrook. In my post-college, pre-publishing days, I’d had a small photography business and had become more than passingly familiar with the art of photo editing. At first, making my own marketing graphics was a matter of adding text to images. 



But I also studied art in college, and markets such as The Hungry Jpeg and Creative Market introduced me to the joys of non-standard brushes and styles, and soon I was making my own artwork and custom pieces to give as gifts. I learned new skills and got faster and better. Well – faster at the doing. The deciding still takes time. 





Over the last couple years, I realized I’d built up a number of graphics in my stash, and I’d had friends and readers asking about purchasing prints. So – now that I’ve more or less settled into my new home and Jane of Austin is out in the world, I'm excited to make them available to everyone! 


To celebrate, I'm giving away a graphic each to two readers - use the form below to enter. Click the logo below to check out the shop!

 HillaryMakes Site
Which graphics are your favorites? Share in the comments below!

  

Great British Bake Off Series 8 Review

$
0
0

Welcome, Bakers! 

Or, at least baking watchers. If you're like me, you love the Great British Bake Off (or, in the US, the Great British Baking Show, a title so charmingly on-the-nose that it mainly works because it's said with a British accent). 

There was a massive shake-up since the filming of Series 7 (they're called "series" rather than "seasons" across the pond), in which the BBC lost the Bake Off to rival Channel 4 when Channel 4 threw down a giant pile of money. Presenters Mel Giedroyc and Sue Perkins opted to stay with the BBC and leave the show, and days later beloved octogenarian Mary Berry left the show as well.  Paul Hollywood (yes, that's his real name) stayed, and the internet deemed him a heartless money grabber because dude wanted to keep his job.

OG Bake Off Staff - Paul, Mary, Sue & Mel.
Channel 4 set to work on the new series, hiring younger woman Prue Lieth (sprightly at 77) as a judge, and Noel Fielding and Sandi Toksvig as presenters. This was followed by a number of articles talking about how the new series would be "updated," with "modern humor."

The internet wrung its hands, tore its clothes, and threw ashes over its head.

Well, the first new series has aired in the UK, and I've seen alllllmost all of it, due to my a.) persistence and b.) YouTube. The first episode remains AWOL so far, but I've gotten to see episodes 2-10.

My take? Unknot your hands, mend your clothes, and wash your hair - everything's okay.

Honestly, Noel and Sandi were my biggest question marks. I knew Noel from The IT Crowd and wasn't familiar with Sandi at all. But they're both very charming in their roles, developing an increasingly odd-couple rapport as the series goes on.

Sandi and Noel, on theme for Bread Week.
Noel won me over first - standing taller than most of the contestants, usually wearing something outlandish, with a shaggy head of raven hair, he's basically a giant human muppet. With a background in stand-up, this may be his most dialed-down self, cracking silly jokes, listening to the bakers and asking questions, coming across more sweetly than you'd expect.

Bake-Off Contestant Tom with Noel, mid-interpretive dance.
It look me another episode to bond with Sandi, but she really shines during segments taking the viewer through Britain's culinary history. As the episodes progress, you can't help but feel affection for her when she tears up during the task of telling the bakers who's eliminated.

Noel and Sandi, because of course.
And Prue? Where Mary Berry had a very grandmotherly appeal, Prue is your awesome and slightly eccentric great aunt, with her forthright nature and has a love for modern statement jewelry . She'll give praise where praise is due, but if something doesn't meet standards, she'll say so. 

Paul, Prue, and Prue's awesome accessories.
This changes the dynamic with Paul in an interesting way. With Mary and Paul, Paul was the tough "man judge," where Mary tended to be more diplomatic. It was the baking version of good cop, bad cop.

But Prue? Prue goes for it (and she clearly knows her stuff). The result is a more diplomatic Paul, a Paul who doesn't go for the kill because it's already dead. He seems a little off-balance at the start, but it's honestly a refreshing change of pace. We didn't need him to be the Simon Cowell of baking.

Bake-Off Contestant Liam with Paul, Prue, and Noel.
And the "modern updates"? Whatever. The tent looks exactly the same. The sheep look exactly the same. You'll still covet the Kitchen Aids. The musical cues twinkle in the background as always, the illustrations remain. As for the humor? Still goofy and charming. The only thing I noticed was that there wasn't the annual "soggy bottom" announcement; instead, Paul intoned, "the bottom is underbaked." 

Paul, Prue, Noel, and Sandi. Please note Noel's shirt.
But all of this is the framework for the bakers themselves. Let's be honest - the show lives and dies by the contestants. I have watched Martha and Chetna's season a few times because I enjoy that group so much. Ruby's season? Eh. 

Bake-Off Contestant Kate
This group is comprised of the strongest group of bakers the show may have ever seen. There are final bakes that will blow you away with their complexity and beauty. Paul and Prue go for it in the technical bakes, challenging the bakers because they know the bakers can handle it. What they're able to make is often astounding, not just for non-professional bakers, but as human people who bake.

Contestants Yan and Liam.
The final is one of the closest I've seen, with each challenge impressive in its difficulty. With many finals you've got two contestants who are really close and one trailing behind - not so with this one. The winning baker absolutely deserved to win, but it was very close.

Stay tuned for the final montage at the end, with an update of each baker. What I love about the show is that it's one of the televised competitions most likely to bring people together - and that continues here, with several of the contestants remaining in contact, taking and planning trips together.

Final verdict? I love Mel, Sue, and Mary, but I really enjoy Noel, Sandi, and Prue, too, and I think Bake Off fans will be really pleased with the Channel 4 version. If you've loved the past Bake Offs, you'll love this too. They're an enjoyable group to watch, and I can't wait until the series airs here in the states on PBS.

A quick note - Prue made news for congratulating the winner on Twitter, several hours before the show aired. She immediately apologized, explaining that she'd gotten the time zones mixed up, since she was currently in Bhutan. For several commenters, this has been a terrible gaff that only proves that Mary Berry is far superior, setting up jokes that Mary was sabotaging her.

This bugs me. Mary left of her own free will - there's nothing to avenge, here. We don't need to pit these women against each other. They can both be good at their jobs, and liking one doesn't mean you have to hate the other. Life doesn't have to work like that. Also, she's a 77-year-old who's traveling to Bhutan and apparently also writes foodie fiction that I need to figure out how to get my hands on. We should be thankful this woman exists! The internet needs to chill the fork out. 

*end rant*

Have you seen any of the new episodes? What did you think?


Southern Autumn Butternut Squash Soup

$
0
0

Funny thing - it only just began to feel at all like fall, here in northern Mississippi. Until a couple weeks ago, it was just Summer 2.0 - still some heat and humidity, but not as much heat. Springtime weather.

Two weeks ago, I was recovering from a long week and declared, on the way home from church, that I absolutely was not cooking for the rest of the day. But then...the rain and drizzle got to me, and all I could think about was butternut squash soup and chocolate chip cookies. So we stopped at the grocery store on the way home from church, and I zipped through the store for butter and brown sugar (for the cookies) and a squash and apples for the soup. In the end, I wound up spending the afternoon and early evening in the kitchen - but we had good food to enjoy because of it!




I like apples in my soup - tart ones. Granny Smiths are great, but any kind of tart baking apple would work. Basically, you're looking for acidity to brighten the squash. I also used half of a Honeycrisp, which was chilling on the shelf in my fridge and found a better use in soup.

A last note - I started using Better than Bouillon years ago, when I got tired of my fridge being a graveyard for half-full boxes of chicken broth. It keeps in the fridge nicely, and makes a flavorful broth. Now that we have an extra freezer in the garage, I'm excited to make homemade chicken stock, but until that time, the Better than Bouillon works well for all of my broth/stock needs.

~ Butternut Squash & Apple Soup ~

1 2lb Butternut squash
1 large onion, chopped fine
2 large carrots, chopped fine
2 ribs of celery, chopped fine
1 1/2 apples (both tart, or a mix of tart and sweet)
5 cups chicken broth (or 5 tsps Better than Bouillon dissolved in 5 cups of hot water)
1/2-1 cup half & half
dash freshly ground nutmeg
salt & pepper to taste
Parmesan cheese, for garnish

Heat oven to 400 degrees, and line a baking sheet with parchment paper or foil, and grease it lightly. With a heavy-duty knife, cut the squash down the middle, splitting it open. Scoop out the seeds. Cut each half in half, place flesh-side down on the baking sheet, allow to roast for 35-45 minutes, or until the squash is very soft and pierces easily with a fork. Remove from oven and allow it to cool enough to handle. Remove and discard outer peel, give the squash a rough chop, and set aside.

While the squash roasts, saute the remaining veggies and apple over medium heat in a large soup pot in a few tablespoons of olive oil and some salt and pepper. Cook, stirring occasionally, until the veggies cook down and have reduced in volume; 15-30 minutes.

Add the squash when it's ready, along with the broth, and allow to simmer together for 30-60 minutes. 

Turn the heat down, and either blend in batches or use an immersion blender to blend the soup until very smooth. Add the half and half and nutmeg, stir, taste, and adjust seasonings as necessary. 

Serve with grated parmesan cheese. Refrigerate leftovers - the soup also freezes beautifully.

What's your favorite fall soup? Share in the comments!



Needtobreath Interview with Seth Bolt: The Extras

$
0
0
Needtobreathe at the Mud Island Amphitheater in Memphis, TN


Back in August, I had a chance to interview Needtobreathe bassist and vocalist Seth Bolt about the band's history and current tour. You can read the official interview - "Needtobreathe finds success in the space between mainstream and gospel"
.
It's a tight piece and well-edited, but that editing for the magazine meant a lot of streamlining, and there's material from the interview I knew a lot of you would want. So here's a bit more. Call it the special features edition!

Seth Bolt
On Meeting Bruce Springsteen: We did meet Bruce Springsteen when we were touring with Taylor Swift, back in 2011, and he was…the coolest dude of all time. He’s just…down to earth. He kinda saw us, over near the side, backstage at a Taylor Swift concert, it can be chaotic, and have a lot of overzealous fans, super young fans – which is probably different from what it’s like at a Springsteen show – we were up, near the front, and he came over and started talking to us, asked what was going on, and we had a great conversation. He’s genuine and heartfelt, interested in what we were doing, signed a guitar for us, it was a really cool thing. 

On the Pressure to Be More or Less Christian: Luckily, we haven’t felt pressure to be more mainstream or more Christian, more spiritual. Everyone just lets us do what we want to do, and I think for that reason what we’ve done, because it’s genuine, hasn’t really fits in either box that well. And we get push-back from both sides. We’re told that our music, that it’s not Christian enough – which, that’s fine. But then, without a doubt there’s discrimination against our band from the mainstream, because of that label, and because some people see a label, and that’s it. They’re like, “not for me.” I think that’s the one reason why we’ve never categorized ourselves as a Christian band, it’s pushes people off and what we love about music is its power to bring people together. 

That’s the beauty of it. In any given night, you can have people from both sides of the political aisle, from every walk of life, rich, poor, different backgrounds, but music brings us all together. Even though we’ve tried to, sort of, shed the label, it has stuck around, so we’re fine with it but we’re here to make music for everybody. We kind of ask people to put aside anything they’ve heard about the band and make their own decision. 
On their Songwriting Process: Bear and Bo Rineheart are the principle songwriters and they are…prolific. I’m sort of the studio guy who tries to capture it, but they write, like, a million different songs every day, just take turns like that. And since Josh Lovett’s joined the band, too, about six years ago, we’ve had a good process. Bear and Bo are still writing the songs, but we’re speaking to them and it’s a really cool thing to be a part of. 

Needtobreathe, the band.

Our stories have been united for a long time, but now that we’re having all these unique experiences outside of music with starting families and everything, we’re able to bring all that back, and push all of it onto the table when it comes time to talk about what we want to say.


On Why Cages was Released Later: We recorded [Cages] shortly after we performed it for the first time – I don’t know, it’s kind of a wild thing. We recorded the song live, thinking it was gonna be on Hardlove, the proper album, and then as we wrote more and more songs, we got to a point where we were trying to figure out how to still put it on the album, but we also didn’t want to have an album that was 16 songs long, in an age where singles are kind of the thing and they have a song or two patience for an artist, people aren’t listening to albums front to back as much as they were. 

I feel like our fans still do that, but we didn’t want to release a marathon, so we did have to cut it from the record which is  why we’re releasing it now – we still love the song and want it to be out there. 



Advice to Younger Bands: Be yourself. There’s a lot of things you can look at to try to emulate or copy or whatever, people just want to hear you do you. 



Together at the Table Sale!

It's Been a Minute

$
0
0
Hey all.

I'm just gonna say it.

I'm terrible at written multi-tasking. Either I'm writing a book or I'm writing blogs, or maybe I'm not even writing at all at which point I'm just bad at the doing of writing, and this has turned into a long sentence.

You may notice that, in fact, the last blog posted was very nearly six months ago. And...I never meant it to be that long. But the thing with blogging is that the longer you're away the harder it is to go back.

Also, things were busy. We experienced our first holiday season in the south, and we spent time with friends and I got sick (again) and I made all of our Christmas gifts and we spent more time with friends. Everyone asks why we moved here, what we were thinking, and you know what? The Mid-south is America's best kept secret. We've moved around a lot over the years, and I feel more settled and at home here than I ever did in the Portland area. Also, I can find parking places. It's a win-win.

After the holidays, life was a blur of visiting family, another round of viruses, and becoming members of our church. Things were settling out a little bit, and I was looking forward to catching up on the writing and blogging and newslettering.

And then Danny's father passed away unexpectedly, and that threw everything, all of us, for a loop. We traveled back to Oregon and spent two weeks there, and since our return Danny's had work trips to Alabama, I got to see Darlingside with my dear friend Ginny in Nashville, and then Danny and I drove to North Carolina and back to attend a sweet cousin's wedding reception.

That was...weekend before last? To complete that whirlwind, I got to speak at the Dixon Gallery & Gardens, which was great but also kinda prepared at the last minute (see previous paragraph). The notes for that will be in the following post, if you're interested.

Also, there will be a newsletter forthcoming I KNOW, BUT I MEAN IT THIS TIME. So if you'd like that in your inbox and haven't subscribed, make sure to do that!

What else? I am still working on a new book. Yes, it is going very slowly. Yes, I hope to pick up the pace. Yes, I like it very much and if you liked Jane of Austin, I think you'll like it too.

I've been reading A Lady in the Smokeand have been enjoying that very much. I also reread The Peach Keeper (which I have to say I enjoyed better as a reread) and have The Music Shop in my TBR pile with Robin Gunn's Woodlands as well for peak nostalgia.

What's kept you busy? What's in your book pile? Share in the comments below!

Writers Corner: Good to the Last Page - A Crash Course in Finishing your Novel or Narrative Nonfiction

$
0
0

On April 25th, I was honored by the opportunity to share about constructing a book in general, and finishing it in particular, at my very favorite place in Memphis - the Dixon Gallery & Gardens. Between the art (lovely!) the grounds (peaceful!) and the programming (fascinating!) it has brought so much joy to my life, so it was lovely to get to participate in one of their weekly lunchtime lectures ("Munch and Learn," every Wednesday at noon).

Anywho, I got to pare down quite a lot of fiction theory into an afternoon chat and was asked (rightfully so) to post the slides on my website. Theoretically, the video should be available at some point? I will follow up on that. In the meantime, let me walk you through what we covered...





For starters, I think it's important for writers to know that writing isn't just about talent and access to a typewriter in a field of flowers. It's also practice and study and preparation and follow-through, and - at least for me - a lot of old-fashioned stubbornness. But it really is a thing that can be learned and improved upon, so if your first efforts don't read like published passages (passages that have been edited by both the author and professional editors, mind you), don't be discouraged!

Where you start with your book depends on where your brain starts. For me, it's concept - it's a "what if this sort of person did this sort of thing and met this person and wouldn't that be interesting?" But that doesn't go much of anywhere unless you figure out who that sort of person is. So let's look at the building blocks.

Goals - What does that character want? In the moment, in the long-term, what do they want from life?

Skills - What does she bring to the table? What makes her special enough to have the story focus on her? Having a skill helps your character to be active - more on that in a minute.

Obstacles - If your character has goals and skills, what's holding her back? Why doesn't she have the things she wants just yet? What flaws and traumas stand in her way?

Altruism - Here is a thing about the brain - we need to see just a teensy bit of altruism for our brain to say "Hey, this character is likeable!" and proceed to care and invest in that character. If you're reading this and you're a Doctor Who fan, think about the introduction of Peter Capaldi's Doctor to the series. I don't know about you, but I had a hard time liking his character for much of that series. And then do you know what they did? His next series out, there was a whole two-part arc about the Doctor having to decide if he was going to save the child version of his mortal enemy, exploring the idea that there was a chance that child wouldn't grow up to be awful. And then he uttered what would become a catchphrase for his character - "I'm the Doctor, and I save people."

That catch phrase popped up over and over for the rest of the series. And that's exactly what our lizard brains needed - we needed to know that he wanted to save people. Tension exists episode to episode over whether he's successful or not, but by resetting his character in that small way, it made a big difference in my response to him. Big enough that I was able to go back and watch the previous season and enjoy it more, having attached to that Doctor as a protagonist.

Fun fact: Blake Snyder wrote about this at length in his book, Save the Cat

Actions - Lastly, interesting stories revolve around the characters, not the other way around. Your characters should be using those goals and skills and making things happen, even if they're the wrong things (because: obstacles). For further reading, check this piece I wrote here.

 Step II - Understand Three-Act Structure.

Here we go! In a nutshell -

Act IAct One has the setup. It's the sharing and showing (rather than telling, mind you) of the setting, the characters, and the stakes, and how those three elements interact with each other. 

Setting? That's the time and place of your book - the more real it is, the more lived-in the story will feel. 

Characters - see above. Although I'll note that having the right ensemble is often really important, having a group of diverse people that you can mix and match into endlessly interesting combinations. Even if it's a book about a family, think about how very different your own family members can be and let your characters reflect that. 

And the stakes - what's at risk? What's the source of tension? Much of that is going to stem from the events created by the...

Inciting Event - It's the thing that happens that sets the plot on its course. It's the thing that, without it, the story doesn't actually happen. It can happen a split second before the start of the book, or two chapters in (note: you've got to be writing striking prose to get away with putting it that late, but it's not at all impossible). Also, just to complicate things, you can even have multiple inciting events, depending on if you're working with interwoven plotlines. 

All that to say, the Inciting Event is the thing that propels your story into...

Act II -  In which everything gets more complicated. Things get tougher and messier as the story develops. Think about Pride and Prejudice - the second act is when Jane and Bingley fall in love, Elizabeth and Darcy keep finding new things to like and dislike each other, and then there's Wickham complicating things for everybody. Every new social engagement deepens the mess, until...

The Halfway Turning Point - in which something - or a couple somethings - happen to propel the action towards the climax. So in Pride , think about when Bingley unexpectedly returns to London - leaving Jane behind without a proposal - and Mr. Collins proposes to Lizzie. Those events propel the actions forward through the rest of the second act. 

The Darkest Moment - Right before - or during - the climax, there must be a moment in which it looks like things are really not going to work out. Wickham and Lydia have run off, and the Bennets may not be able to weather the scandal - certainly not in Merryton. 

The Climax - This is the culmination of all the plot, all of the incendiary pieces lined up and exploding. It's Chekhov's gun firing. Writing is different for everybody, but the climactic set piece is some of the toughest writing in the book. The emotions are high, the action fast, the dialogue short and fraught (yes, you can use a Profound Monologue but for goodness' sake, do so sparingly. Monologues can get pedantic when they're overused) and the main characters will leave changed. 

How changed? Take a look at the character elements above. How have their goals changed over the course of the story? What about their skills, or obstacles? How have their perspectives shifted? An unchanged, static character is one that ultimately feels like a waste. It's like loading your readers onto a flight that promises a trip to Paris but actually takes them straight back to the original airport. So remember as you're crafting your character, give them space to grow. If they're near perfect at the beginning, it's less compelling. We see those character changes in...

Act III - which features the denoument, or "tying up" of the plot. The action isn't at the same high, but we're still working to see things resolve. Look at it as finding out where the pieces fall after things the explosion. However, know that not every plotline has to be resolved tidily. Even if you're writing a Happily Ever After book, you may still have an element that isn't lovingly tied up.

In my second book, Simply Sara, there remains a rift between Sara and one of her parents. And yes, I got reader mail about it. But I didn't want to tie that piece up - I didn't ignore it, but I didn't resolve it. And it's up to you, what gets tied and not. For me, I didn't feel like the estranged parent would be someone whose mind would be easily altered, that a change of heart at the end would read trite. So while that situation isn't dropped or ignored, it's also not given a HEA ending, not yet.

What else?

The graph at the top - that's a suggestion. The inciting incident can happen before the first page, and the climax can hit at the very end and leave you with a short third act. And then you can pull a Steven Spielberg and have a third act that really kinda morphs into a fourth act. For myself, I like a longer third act that doesn't drag, because I need the exhale time. I have my coping mechanisms if it's short (reading it three times over), but for an ending to feel satisfying, I need a bit more of an end and an emotional high after the worst is over. 


So yes - three act structure. Y'all still with me? Honestly, there are books and books and books about this, but as mentioned above, this is a crash course to point you in the right direction. 

Another way to think of story structure is like a house - the first act is the foundation, the second is the walls, and the third is the roof. I think a lot about how the first act is a foundation, because sooooo many first act issues come from a foundation that isn't sturdy enough. 


So basically, if you're stuck in the beginning, double check your elements. But also - and I TOTALLY FORGOT TO PUT THIS ON THE SLIDE - a lot of the time, if you're stuck in the first act, it can be a time management issue. So make sure you've got the time you need to really think through everything in the first act, because it really is the foundation for the entire story. 


I know I'm harping on stakes a lot, but they matter! I have a hard time setting the stakes high enough because I don't want to be mean to my characters (who, for the record, don't actually exist). But without stakes, there's no tension and no momentum. 

An example of this that I go back to a lot is the character of Margot in Jane of Austin. I was thinking I'd be clever and minimalist by paring down some of Austen's cast from Sense and Sensibility, but when it came down to it, there was no glue to hold them together. The fact that they were dedicated to sticking together, moving across the country together as grown adults didn't make sense. It didn't make sense, and I was plowing through the second act even while the story wasn't quite holding up.

So I did what I learned to do time and time again - go back to the text. And the youngest sister, Margaret, was right there, saying the wrong things and being hopeful and despondent by turns. In my version, adding Margot turned out to be key. Not only were Jane and Celia co-owners of their business, but they were their sister's guardian after their father's business disgrace (I kinda pulled from Persuasion in the setup, you'll have to actually read it to see how that worked out). But as guardians of a teenager, they had  to stick together to work things out. I didn't start writing Margot until I was nearly halfway through the story, but she ended up being the emotional core of the book. 



Ending books can be hard, especially if you've really worked at creating lots of tension along the way. At a certain point, you can feel like you're holding a soda can that's fizzing out and the top and wondering What on earth do I do next

So that's when I go back to the planning. Look at the threads that need tying, and look at how they can be tied and resolved together. Think about the ways the characters have grown and changed and how that affects their actions. Plan ahead, but follow the story and see where it takes you. 


You wouldn't build a house without blueprints, and I wouldn't recommend writing a book without a synopsis. Not if you're wanting to finish in any reasonable amount of time. It's funny - if you get a bunch of authors together and bring up synopses, you'll see a few full-body winces. But other author friends and I have compared notes, and all of us have come around to them. The fact of the matter is that when you're writing on deadline, synopses are necessary. I can keep yammering here about them, but I've already yammered at length about them, and you can read that here.

The time factor for writing is real. Time you're writing is time you're not working on other tasks or, you know, sleeping. So if you're wanting to write and your schedule is packed full, take a hard look at your calendar and look at what to swap out.

And last - everything you write, every word, can be edited. So don't start off pressuring yourself to write with excellence. Don't even pressure yourself to write well. Because sometimes you need to trick your brain to write at all, and you do that by being fully content to write badly. There's no pressure in that, right? Better to write reams of terrible prose than none at all, because here's the thing - you can't edit what doesn't exist.

Does there come a time when you have to back away from the editing and let a professional take over? Absolutely. But when you're working at getting those early drafts out, whatever you need to do to trick your brain into playing ball? Do that.


That brings us to the end of the material I prepared for the Dixon - when I presented there, I fielded a bunch of questions on a number of topics. If you've got any questions, share in the comments below!

INSPY Contemporary Romance Shortlist Giveaway Bundle!

$
0
0

It's been such an honor to be shortlisted alongside such a wonderful group of women for the 2018 INSPY Award! To celebrate, we decided to giveaway a bundle a books to a lucky reader. You can get to know all of the authors a bit below, and then enter to win the bundle below!
_________________________________________________________________________________


N i c o l e  D e e s e
Shortlisted Title - A New Shade of Summer

Favorite food to grill - Chicken kabobs! We grill them about once a week. So yummy! The kids love to help skewer the peppers and fresh pineapple to the marinated chicken. It’s one of our favorite dinners to eat in the summer.

The beach read I’d recommend right now - Sadly, I haven’t read many beachy-type reads lately (although I love them!), but I have enjoyed some books by Jenny Colgan (a general market author) who has a new release out, The Endless Beach. I’m planning to read it on my vacation next week!

The song I'm singing along to in my car - I'm in love with the song, "I Get To Love You" by Ruelle. The lyrics inspired my current writing project, so it gets played a lot!

_________________________________________________________________________________

B e c k y  W a d e
Shortlisted Title - True to You.
Favorite food to grill - Balsamic marinated chicken.

The beach read I’d recommend right now - What Alice Forgot by Liane Moriarty.  The main character, Alice, has amnesia and forgets a huge chunk of her life. I had a blast discovering, alongside Alice, all the things she’d forgotten. Liane writes with a great deal of heart and humor.  Her characters are achingly, astonishingly real.

The song I'm singing along to in my car - "What About Us" by
Pink. Every time it comes on the radio, my nine year old and I both belt it out.
_________________________________________________________________________________ 

H i l l a r y  M a n t o n  L o d g e
Shortlisted Title - Jane of Austin

Favorite food to grill - Kabobs! Especially if they’re truly Mediterranean-inspired, with lots of garlic, lemon, and herbs.

The beach read I'd recommend right now- Georgette Heyer’s The Grand Sophy - all the witty hijinks a girl could want on a beach.

The song you’re singing along to in my car- Ginny Owens’ "The Loudest Voice." Soooo catchy and happy! Also love Lucius' song "How Loud Your Heart Gets." I'll never not be obsessed with that song.
_________________________________________________________________________________

C o u r t n e y  W a l s h
Shortlisted Title - Just Look Up
Favorite food to grill - I’m going with a traditional burger (mostly because I eat one every single night!)

The beach read I’d recommend right now - How do I pick just ONE!!?? I’m loving Slightly South of Simple by Kristy Woodson Harvey, but beach reads are my FAVORITE so I’ve got a pretty big stack!

The song I'm singing along to in my car -Oh, gosh, normally some tune from whatever show we’re directing, but I’m embarrassed to admit that as of yesterday my daughter introduced me to a new song by Five Seconds of Summer called “Lie to Me”. The lyrics are really ridiculous, but the song is so catchy. I can’t get it out of my head!
_________________________________________________________________________________

K a r a  I s a a c
Shortlisted Title - Then There Was You
 
Favorite food to grill - Chili and lime marinated prawns.
The beach read I’d recommend right now - It’s winter in New Zealand so the beach feels a loooong way away but I recently read Lisa Wingate’s Before We Were Yours on vacation and loved it! It’s a split time novel set in the 1930s and today about illegal adoption based on the true story of Georgia Tann and the Tennessee Children’s Society.

The song I'm singing along to in my car - I am very rarely alone in the car but my 4-year-old loves singing when we’re driving and the current favourite is “I had a little turtle." I know it by heart ("I had a little turtle, his name was Tiny Tim. I put him in the bathtub to see if he could swim…") plus bonus actions 🙂
_________________________________________________________________________________


Use the widget below to enter the Giveaway! 
Do you have a question for any of the authors? Sound off below!


Looking back on 2018 -

$
0
0


Happy New Year! I've been meaning to write for a while, but life and work kept getting in the way.

One of the questions I get asked a lot is what I'm writing. I am writing - some. But I'm doing a lot of other things these days. My graphic design work has kept me busy, and I've really enjoyed it. Church has kept me hopping - this spring, I'm writing/organizing much of our women's bible study materials and then co-leading the sessions. I'm also on the pulpit search committee, since our pastor took another post last summer. 

Anyway, with all of that going on, I've picked up and put down a few writing projects. I've learned that when you're on deadline, you write the thing you're most stressed about completing. But when you're not on deadline, you write the thing you love most. 

This last year was a rough one. My father-in-law passed away unexpectedly and we had a lot of travel in the spring. Mid-summer, I started addressing some health problems and underwent minor surgery in the fall. through all that, I found myself wanting to write the kinds of books that helped keep my spirits afloat - mainstream contemporary romantic comedies. Everything else I started writing was a little too solemn, or a little too considered; starting something that I could have fun with, something that made me laugh, was a breath of fresh air. So that's the plan. 

(Btw, my agent whole-heartedly approves of this, so, like Reading Rainbow, you don't have to take my word for it. But really, you should.)

The other plan has been to continue to have a more balanced life - aside from work, there's time for friends, time for cooking, time for crafting. A couple of the projects from the holiday season - 



 I made a wreath from magnolia leaves...

...and meant to change out the ribbon and never did. I am at peace.  (Enjoy bonus Sylvie, the blur.)


I found inexpensive vases at Goodwill, spray-painted them, hand-painted with a contrast color, and then arranged them on my mantle - 

I'm really happy with how they came out! Also, loved my pom-pom garland (thank you, Target). 


The dogs were cute -


 And I made pretty much all of our family Christmas gifts.


I'm sure there will be lots more projects to come! What projects kept you busy over the holidays? Share in the comments below!



Jane of Austin on E-Book Sale!

$
0
0
I'm so thrilled to see Jane of Austin on e-book sale! Click here to get a copy from the vendor of your choice.


Pardon the Design Dust...

$
0
0
A little dusty around here - both in terms of some long (very, very long) overdue redesigns on the site as well as a general, er, lack of posting in the year 2019.

I've been hard at work, and shortly parts of the site, particularly the design portions, should reflect that. I've gotten to make a bunch of covers for a bunch of super talented writers, made a bunch of graphics for my Etsy shop, and also been working away on a new book. And then off of my computer, life is a series of busy somethings - feeding people, serving on church committees, and occasionally getting to get out into the world a bit.

All that to say, things should be tidying up here in the weeks to come, freshening up and getting all of the plug-ins working again. What have your busy somethings looked like lately? Share in the comments!

Lodge Family Adoption

$
0
0

Hope is a weird thing.

I'm late posting this, but it's been a day. 

I got an email from our adoption coordinator this morning. We’ve been working with this agency for over a year now, working towards adoption for three. Wanting to have a family for ten. Lots of stops and starts for all sorts of reasons – health, family emergencies, covid. But this time, with this agency, things were moving forward. Our home study was finalized, applications completed, profiled written up, pictures taken.

The agency has had our completed profile, a five-page pdf about me and Danny, for about six weeks. Danny’s been travelling for work more than usual – power plant outage season – and we’d planned to start our grant applications and adoption fundraising when he was back from his second trip.

But this email.

We’d known there were a couple birth moms at the agency. The last handful of women considering adoption had chosen to parent, so I didn’t have high expectations. The email arrived, giving us an update – one mom choosing to parent, another being induced the following week. That second mother had chosen a family, but the family hadn’t been notified because they were waiting on the waiver from the birth father, who was currently out of state.

Probably not us. Right? We would know if we were in the running, I thought as I brushed out my hair for the morning. Should I tell Danny? He was on site at a nuclear plant, I didn’t want to burden him. And it was probably, definitely not us.

Lord, if it’s us, you’ll have to figure out the money thing. 

But it probably wasn’t us.

Because the moms interview the birth parents first. Wouldn’t I want that if I were in her shoes? She would have interviewed other families. It was fine. Maybe next spring.

And then I got the call.

“Hillary? Are you home? Can you talk? Is Danny home?” The adoption coordinator asked.

So I called Danny, who was on-site, supervising…something. Told him the coordinator called and wanted to speak to both of us. I couldn’t put words, though, to what we both knew it probably meant.

Because hope is a weird thing.

We got everybody on, and the coordinator told us she also had the birth mother counselor on the line. Because that’s what they do when they tell you that your profile has been selected. Because that baby that was probably definitely not ours at all was actually our baby.

Our baby girl.

I have tears in my eyes, small ones, but I haven’t cried because it’s so strange to hear something you’ve thought about and hoped for, for so many, many, many years, is in the process of happening. That a young college student in a STEM field has plans for her life that don’t involve a baby, but she’s chosen to carry her pregnancy to term and place her baby with a family. That she doesn’t want to meet the family, doesn’t want contact, but wants to do the hard thing – giving her baby a life and a family a baby.

Hope is a weird thing.

Today has been a flurry of calls, getting logistics into place - because we have to have the funds ready to go before baby girl comes home.

Also a car seat.

Also a pediatrician.

Also a name.

Danny flies back early tomorrow. There are decisions to make. Funds to raise. I'm posting this very late so that I can perhaps relax a little and...sleep? But the Lord is bringing us a baby girl, in time for Thanksgiving, and we are so very full of thanks.

 

First and foremost, we would appreciate prayers for Baby Girls’ safe delivery, and for her birth mama as she transitions into her next season of life.

If you would like to contribute to the adoption fund, you may through AdoptTogether (tax-deductible, 5% fees), GoFundMe (2.9% fees + $0.30 fee per donation), or through Venmo (@hillarymantonlodge, no fees). We are working with Adoption Choices of Memphis





Latest Images